An AI inventory becomes useful when someone can use it to decide what needs attention next. A list of vendor names alone rarely provides enough context for that discussion.

NIST AI RMF 1.0 includes inventory mechanisms under GOVERN 1.6 and connects risk management with understanding an AI system’s context, measuring risks, and prioritizing responses. These are related functions, not a mandatory linear checklist. Read the NIST AI RMF Core.

Start with one workflow

For a practical first exercise, choose a business process that already uses AI. Interview the person responsible for the process and ask them to walk through a recent example. Record what the tool actually does, rather than relying only on the purchase description.

A useful working record could include:

• The business purpose and current deployment stage.
• The people using the output and the actions it informs.
• The data sources and connected tools.
• The business and technical contacts.
• The evidence available for review and the questions still unanswered.

Separate a finding from an assumption

“No approval record was provided” is different from “no approval occurred.” Preserve that distinction. Record what was reviewed, what was missing, and who can resolve the uncertainty.

For example, an illustrative review of an internal writing assistant might find a documented access policy but no evidence that document permissions were tested. The next task would be to obtain or perform that test, with a named owner and an agreed scope.

Turn the inventory into a work queue

Group the next actions by the decision they support. Some questions may need an immediate answer before expansion; others may be appropriate for a scheduled review. Explain the basis for each priority rather than presenting an unexplained score.

For every action, specify the owner, due date, expected evidence, and decision that follows. That gives the inventory a practical role in the organization’s ongoing work.

A useful first output

Start with a short register of systems and a separate action list. Expand the detail when it helps someone make a better decision, rather than treating completeness as a substitute for progress.

Discuss your AI governance questions with StrategyAI Partners.

Back to Insights