Shadow AI in the workflow.
Employees adopt tools faster than procurement, security, and legal can review them. Each unregistered tool is an unmeasured exposure to CUI and a finding waiting to happen.
AI Governance Readiness
StrategyAI Partners helps defense contractors and regulated enterprises prepare for CMMC, CUI, and DoD AI requirements. Our fixed-scope assessment shows exactly where your AI use stands, what an assessor will ask for, and what to fix first. Two to four weeks, fixed fee, no software to buy.
Our advisory leadership brings PhD-level research grounding, CISM and CRISC certifications, and more than 20 years of federal and defense-sector experience, including professional experience at SAIC, Lockheed Martin, and Accenture Federal.
The problem
Defense contractors are adopting AI faster than they can govern it. Copilots draft proposals, models screen resumes, and analytics tools touch controlled unclassified information — often before anyone has documented who approved the tool, what data it can see, or how its output is reviewed.
The requirements are no longer theoretical. CMMC 2.0 assessments now examine how you protect CUI, including where AI tools process it. NIST AI RMF and DoD AI guidance expect documented risk management, not good intentions. DFARS 252.204-7012 makes data protection and incident handling contractual.
Most mid-sized contractors are caught between two bad options: wait for an assessor to find the gaps, or buy another tool that answers none of the governance questions.
Employees adopt tools faster than procurement, security, and legal can review them. Each unregistered tool is an unmeasured exposure to CUI and a finding waiting to happen.
CMMC, NIST AI RMF, NIST SP 800-171, and DoD AI guidance overlap but do not say the same thing. Without a crosswalk, teams duplicate work and still miss controls.
When an assessor, a customer, or a board asks how AI is governed, the answer has to be documented. Policy language alone does not survive review.
The gap is easier and cheaper to close before an assessment than after one.
The lead offer
A fixed-scope, fixed-fee assessment that shows where your AI use stands against CMMC, NIST AI RMF, and DoD requirements — and what to fix first.
Defense contractors and regulated enterprises that use AI on or near sensitive data, are preparing for a CMMC assessment, or need to answer a customer or board question about AI risk. It fits organizations with a real AI footprint and no documented governance model — or a model that has never been tested.
Frameworks covered
The assessment is structured around the requirements that govern defense contractors. We do not replace your assessor, your counsel, or your security team. We give all three a shared, documented picture of how AI is used and governed.
Every finding in the report names the framework and requirement it maps to. Nothing is scored on opinion alone.
How it works
01
A 20-minute call to confirm your AI footprint, your contracting environment, and the decision you need the assessment to support. You provide a short list of AI tools in use and your current CMMC status; we confirm whether the fixed-fee scope fits.
02
In week one we send a structured request list. You provide current AI and security policies, vendor agreements, data-flow documentation, and access to the people who own each AI tool. No system access is required.
03
Across weeks one to three we review the evidence, interview tool owners, and test your AI use against CMMC, NIST AI RMF, and DoD guidance. Plan on 60 to 90 minutes from each relevant owner.
04
In weeks three and four we deliver the scorecard, gap map, inventory, register, charter outline, and roadmap, then brief your leadership. You leave with a prioritized plan and a board-ready summary.
Timeline
2–4 weeks from kickoff, assuming timely access to documents and tool owners.
Pricing
$18,500
fixed fee (starting at)
That fee covers the full assessment for a single business unit: document review, owner interviews, the scorecard, gap map, inventory, register, charter outline, board briefing, and 90-day roadmap. If your scope differs — multiple business units, classified environments, or a larger AI footprint — we quote the variation in writing before any work begins.
Proof
The fastest way to judge whether this is useful is to read one. Our sample AI governance assessment shows the scorecard, gap map, and 90-day roadmap you receive, with client details removed. It is the same structure you get at the end of an engagement.
See a sample assessmentWhy StrategyAI Partners
Your engagement is led by advisors with PhD-level research grounding, CISM and CRISC certifications, and more than 20 years of federal and defense-sector experience. You are not handed to a junior delivery team after the contract is signed.
We sell no software and take no vendor commissions. Our only interest is an accurate picture of your risk, which means the recommendation you get is the one your organization actually needs.
We start from how your data is protected and how decisions are made, not from a product demo. That background shows in findings your security team can implement and your assessor can trace.
Findings arrive in language your board, your CMMC assessor, and your counsel can each use. One assessment produces one story, told consistently to every audience that asks.
Follow-on services
Most clients start with the readiness assessment. When they need more, two follow-on services are available. Both are scoped after the assessment, so the work builds on findings rather than repeating them.
For leadership teams deciding where AI belongs, what to build, and what to stop. Engagements are scoped individually around a specific decision, investment, or operating model change.
For teams that need to operate the governance model, not just approve it. Delivered to executives, risk owners, and AI tool owners, using your own policies and findings as the teaching material.
FAQ
The AI Governance Readiness Assessment starts at $18,500 fixed fee for a single business unit. That covers the full scope described above. If your environment requires more — multiple business units, classified work, or a larger AI footprint — we quote the variation in writing before any work begins.
Two to four weeks from kickoff. The timeline depends mainly on how quickly documents and tool owners are available. We agree the schedule at kickoff and flag slippage the week it happens, not at the end.
A list of AI tools in use, current AI and security policies, vendor agreements, data-flow documentation, and 60 to 90 minutes from each AI tool owner. No system access is required, and we do not ask you to transfer CUI to us.
No. We do not perform CMMC assessments and we do not provide legal advice. We prepare the evidence and documentation that your assessor and counsel will ask for, which usually makes both relationships easier.
We assess and advise. We do not resell products, take implementation contracts, or earn commissions from vendors. If you need implementation, we tell you what to look for and leave the selection to you.
We sign your NDA and work within your CUI handling procedures. Collection is limited to what the assessment needs. Where artifacts contain CUI, we review them in your environment or under your approved handling arrangements rather than moving them into ours.
Next step
AI governance is easier to fix before an assessment than after one. If you are preparing for CMMC, deploying AI on sensitive data, or answering a board question about AI risk, start with a 20-minute call. We will tell you whether the readiness assessment is the right next step — and if it is not, we will say so.
Prefer email? Write to contact@strategyaipartners.com.